Digi Portal LLC v. FedEx Corporation
| Digi Portal LLC |
| FedEx Corporation |
| 1:2022cv01289 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to January 4, 2023 - filed by FedEx Corporation. (Mabey, Warren) |
SO ORDERED re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint to January 4, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: FedEx Corporation answer due 1/4/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/8/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Digi Portal LLC.FedEx Corporation served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. (deBruin, David) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney David R. Bennett for Digi Portal LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk) |
|
SO ORDERED re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett filed by Digi Portal LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/19/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David R. Bennett - filed by Digi Portal LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(deBruin, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01289-MN, 1:22-cv-01290-MN (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to FedEx Corporation on 9/30/2022. (mpb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Digi Portal LLC. (mpb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,352,854 ;5,983,227 ;7,171,414 ;7,565,359 ;9,626,342. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against FedEx Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3972375.) - filed by Digi Portal LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit Appearance of Counsel, #15 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Digi Portal LLC v. FedEx Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Digi Portal LLC | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Represented By: | David R. Bennett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FedEx Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Warren K. Mabey, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
