Bell Semiconductor, LLC v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. et al
| Bell Semiconductor, LLC |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Acer, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01293 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
SO ORDERED, re #32 Joint MOTION to Stay all further proceedings until February 3, 2023, filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Case stayed. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/9/2023. (kmd)
|
| Filing 32 Joint MOTION to Stay all further proceedings until February 3, 2023 - filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #31 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas J. Friel, Jr., filed by Super Micro Computer, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/3/2023. (kmd)
|
| Filing 31 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas J. Friel, Jr. - filed by Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
|
Filing 30
SO ORDERED, re #29 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Motion to Sever and Stay and Motion to Dismiss to January 17, 2023, filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Reset Briefing Schedule: re #24 MOTION DEFENDANTS ACER, HP, HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE, LENOVO, AND SUPER MICROS MOTION TO SEVER AND STAY, #27 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Answering Brief due 1/17/2023. Reply Brief due 2/7/2023. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/29/2022. (kmd)
|
| Filing 29 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Motion to Sever and Stay and Motion to Dismiss to January 17, 2023 - filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 28 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #27 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/3/2023. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 27 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 26 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Peter Sauer and James P. Brogan for Super Micro Computer, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 25 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #24 MOTION DEFENDANTS ACER, HP, HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE, LENOVO, AND SUPER MICROS MOTION TO SEVER AND STAY filed by Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/3/2023. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 24 MOTION DEFENDANTS ACER, HP, HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE, LENOVO, AND SUPER MICROS MOTION TO SEVER AND STAY - filed by Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Rule 7.1.1 Certification)(Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 23 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 22 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Acer, Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 21 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by HP Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 20 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 19 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Lenovo Holding Company, Inc., Other Affiliate Lenovo Group Limited, Other Affiliate Legend Holdings Corporation for Lenovo (United States) Inc. filed by Lenovo (United States) Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 18 Supplemental Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christopher S. Ponder, Eric K. Gill, Ericka J. Schulz, Harper S. Batts, Jeffrey Liang, and Lai L. Yip for Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., and Super Micro Computer, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James P. Brogan; Peter Sauer - filed by Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James P. Brogan; Peter Sauer filed by Super Micro Computer, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/12/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 16
SO ORDERED, re #13 Stipulation For filing an Amended Complaint, filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, HP Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc., Acer, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/6/2022. (kmd)
|
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants - filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Harper Batts; Ericka J. Schulz; Lai L. Yip; Christopher Ponder; Jeffrey Liang; Eric K. Gill - filed by Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 13 Joint STIPULATION For filing an Amended Complaint by Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc.. (Haynes, Christine) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Harper Batts; Ericka J. Schulz; Lai L. Yip; Christopher Ponder; Jeffrey Liang; Eric K. Gill, filed by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, HP Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc., Acer, Inc., Lenovo (United States) Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/5/2022. (kmd)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to December 7, 2022, filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Reset Answer Deadlines: Acer, Inc. answer due 12/7/2022; Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. answer due 12/7/2022; HP Inc. answer due 12/7/2022; Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company answer due 12/7/2022; Lenovo (United States) Inc. answer due 12/7/2022; Super Micro Computer, Inc. answer due 12/7/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/2/2022. (kmd)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer Complaint to December 7, 2022 - filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 11 Return of Service Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. Acer, Inc. served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC.Acer, Inc. served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC.Super Micro Computer, Inc. served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC.Lenovo (United States) Inc. served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC.Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC.Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. served on 10/17/2022, answer due 11/7/2022. (Devlin, Timothy) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01292-CFC, 1:22-cv-01293-CFC (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (smg) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Hilco Patent Acquisition 56, LLC, Corporate Parent Hilco IP Merchant Capital, LLC, Corporate Parent Hilco, Inc. for Bell Semiconductor, LLC filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (smg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,640,333 ; US 8,049,340 ; US 8,288,269 ; US 8,319,343 ; US 8,933,737. (smg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against Acer, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., HP Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Lenovo (United States) Inc., Super Micro Computer, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3972683.) - filed by Bell Semiconductor, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
