Distributed Media Solutions, LLC v. AMC Networks Inc.
| Distributed Media Solutions, LLC |
| AMC Networks Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01294 |
| September 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #8 Second STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 15, 2022 filed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/28/2022. (etg)
|
| Filing 8 Second STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 15, 2022 - filed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to November 26, 2022 filed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/25/22. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to November 26, 2022 - filed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC.AMC Networks Inc. served on 10/5/2022, answer due 10/26/2022. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to AMC Networks Inc. on 9/30/2022. (srs) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Pinnacle Innovations, LLC for Distributed Media Solutions, LLC filed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC. (srs) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,697,811 ;7,133,922 ;7,739,714 ;8,046,672 ;8,122,004 ;8,437,389 ;8,482,384. (srs) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against AMC Networks Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3972684.) - filed by Distributed Media Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Distributed Media Solutions, LLC v. AMC Networks Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Distributed Media Solutions, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Represented By: | Richard Charles Weinblatt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AMC Networks Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
