Splunk Inc. v. Cribl, Inc. et al
Splunk Inc. |
Cribl, Inc. and Clint Sharp |
1:2022cv01313 |
October 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Joel H Slomsky |
Patent |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice and Agreement to Refile Litigation in the Northern District of California by Splunk Inc.. (Morrison, Susan) |
Filing 11 DESIGNATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE TO HOLD A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE CIRCUIT: Case reassigned to Senior Judge Joel H Slomsky for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Michael A Chagares on 11/3/2022. (nms) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Cribl, Inc. answer due 11/30/2022; Clint Sharp answer due 11/30/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/27/2022. (nms) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to November 30, 2022 - filed by Cribl, Inc., Clint Sharp. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Splunk Inc..Clint Sharp served on 10/8/2022, answer due 10/31/2022. (Morrison, Susan) |
CORRECTING ENTRY: The executed summons filed at D.I. 9 has been removed from the docket per the filer's request. A corrected document will be refiled. The Answer deadline for the defendant has been reset. (nms) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew G. Pearson, Frank E. Scherkenbach, Kevin Su, Daniel H Wade, Adam J. Kessel, Kayleigh E. McGlynn, and Olivia Nguyen for Splunk Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frank E. Scherkenbach, Andrew G. Pearson, Adam Kessel, Kevin Su, Kayleigh E. McGlynn, Daniel H. Wade and Olivia Nguyen, filed by Splunk Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/12/2022. (nms) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frank E. Scherkenbach, Andrew G. Pearson, Adam Kessel, Kevin Su, Kayleigh E. McGlynn, Daniel H. Wade and Olivia Nguyen - filed by Splunk Inc.. (Morrison, Susan) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Splunk Inc..Cribl, Inc. served on 10/6/2022, answer due 10/27/2022. (Morrison, Susan) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Cribl, Inc. on 10/5/2022; Clint Sharp on 10/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(mpb) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Splunk Inc.. (mpb) |
Filing 4 Report to the Register of Copyrights for Copyright Number(s)SEE ATTACHED;. (mpb) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 9,208,206 ;US 9,762,443 ;US 9,838,467 ;US 10,255,312 ;US 10,805,438. (mpb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Cribl, Inc., Clint Sharp ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3975903.) - filed by Splunk Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Civil Cover Sheet), (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/6/2022: #14 Exhibit M) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.