Array BioPharma Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
Counter Defendant: Array BioPharma Inc.
Counter Claimant: Sandoz Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01316
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Gregory B Williams
Nature of Suit: Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA)
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2022 Filing 15 ANSWER to #12 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Answer to Counterclaims -- by Array BioPharma Inc..(Dellinger, Megan)
November 8, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re (11 in 1:22-cv-01277-GBW, 14 in 1:22-cv-01316-GBW) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aaron Stiefel, Daniel P. DiNapoli and David McMullen filed by Array BioPharma Inc., Array BioPharma, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/8/22. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01277-GBW, 1:22-cv-01316-GBW (ntl)
November 4, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aaron Stiefel, Daniel P. DiNapoli and David McMullen - filed by Array BioPharma Inc., Array BioPharma, Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan)
November 2, 2022 Filing 13 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Novartis AG for Sandoz Inc. filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick)
November 2, 2022 Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against Array BioPharma Inc. by Sandoz Inc..(Gattuso, Dominick)
November 2, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Laura A. Lydigsen for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk)
November 2, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Mark H. Remus for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
November 2, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Alexis S. White for Sandoz Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr)
October 31, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark H. Remus, Laura A. Lydigsen and Alexis S. White of Crowell & Moring LLP filed by Sandoz Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/31/22. (ntl)
October 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER re #8 Unopposed Motion to Place Complaint Under Seal filed by Sandoz Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/28/22. (ntl)
October 27, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION to Seal Document: #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion to Place Complaint Under Seal filed by Array BioPharma Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
October 27, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark H. Remus, Laura A. Lydigsen and Alexis S. White of Crowell & Moring LLP - filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Gattuso, Dominick)
October 26, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION to Seal Document: #1 Complaint Unopposed Motion to Place Complaint Under Seal - filed by Sandoz Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1)(Gattuso, Dominick)
October 12, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Array BioPharma Inc..Sandoz Inc. served on 10/12/2022, answer due 11/2/2022. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
October 12, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Sandoz Inc. on 10/6/2022. (vfm)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Pfizer Inc. for Array BioPharma Inc. filed by Array BioPharma Inc.. (vfm)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,314,464 B2 ;9,850,229 B2 ;10,005,761 B2 ;9,562,016 B2 ;9,598,376 B2 ;9,980,944 B2. (vfm)
October 6, 2022 Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: 08/24/2022. Date of Expiration of Patent: See Attached.Thirty Month Stay Deadline: 12/27/2025. (vfm)
October 6, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm)
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for ANDA/PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed against Sandoz Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3976575.) - filed by Array BioPharma Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(vfm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Array BioPharma Inc. v. Sandoz Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: Array BioPharma Inc.
Represented By: Jack B. Blumenfeld
Represented By: Megan Elizabeth Dellinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Sandoz Inc.
Represented By: Dominick T. Gattuso
Represented By: Alexis S. White
Represented By: Laura A. Lydigsen
Represented By: Mark H. Remus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?