Diggs v. Ceresini et al
Murad Diggs |
Scott Ceresini and Attorney General of the State of Delaware |
1:2022cv01343 |
October 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 AEDPA Election Form filed by petitioner and unclearly indicated a request to rule on 2254 as currently pending and requesting to amend 2254 to include all grounds within 30 days. (mpb) |
Filing 3 ORDER; Petitioner must file the attached election form with the Court within thirty days of the entry of this order. Failure to timely return the completed election form will result in the Court's ruling on this pending petition as filed. Notice of Compliance deadline set for 12/7/2022.Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/7/2022. (Attachments: #1 Authorization Form) (mpb) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5 PAID Receipt DEX038074 .) - filed by Murad Diggs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.