Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA, Inc.
| Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC |
| Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. |
| 1:2022cv01379 |
| October 20, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kyrie Kimber Cameron - filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification in support of pro hac vice admission, #2 Proposed order)(Donelson, Matthew) |
SO ORDERED re #15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kyrie Kimber Cameron filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/15/2022. (dlw)
|
|
Filing 14
ORAL ORDER -IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/14/2022. (dlw) Modified on 12/14/2022 (dlw).
|
| Filing 13 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc.. (Donelson, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc..(Donelson, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Barden Todd Patterson - filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Proposed Order)(Donelson, Matthew) Modified on 12/14/2022 (dlw). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew P. Donelson on behalf of Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service Certificate of Service)(Donelson, Matthew) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: The Oral Order entered at D.I. 14 has been updated to include language for patent infringement actions. (dlw) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 12 and 13 have been deleted from the docket at the request of counsel. (dlw) |
|
SO ORDERED re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Barden Todd Patterson filed by Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/14/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer - filed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. (Jones, Keith) |
|
SO ORDERED re #9 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. answer due 12/14/2022). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/8/2022. (dlw)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Keith A. Jones on behalf of Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC (Jones, Keith) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bradley D. Liddle and Michael Pomeroy - filed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Butler, Dennis) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frederick A. Tecce - filed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Butler, Dennis) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Bradley D. Liddle and Michael Pomeroy, #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frederick A. Tecce filed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/25/2022. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC.Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. served on 10/21/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Butler, Dennis) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. (mkr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,998,753 B2. (mkr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-3987135.) - filed by Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(mkr) |
| No Summons Issued. (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC v. Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charge Fusion Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Dennis James Butler |
| Represented By: | Keith A. Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Polestar Automotive USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John A. Elzufon |
| Represented By: | Matthew P. Donelson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
