Degaetano v. A Citizens Group et al.
Susan Marie Rafferty Degaetano |
A Citizens Group, The Advocates and The Cloud + appropriate subsidiaries |
1:2022cv01460 |
November 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 6 Letter to Judge Connolly from Susan Rafferty Degaetano regarding concerns about the diminishment of the genius population. (smg) |
Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Magistrate Consent Notice (AO Form 85 and 85A) filed by Susan Marie Rafferty Degaetano. (lam) |
Filing 4 Letter to Judge Connolly from Susan Rafferty Degaetano requesting this case to be held pending settlement. (lam) |
Remark: Signed magistrate consent notice submitted by plaintiff, signed by plaintiff only, placed back in case jacket. (lam) |
|
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se against A Citizens Group and The Cloud + appropriate subsidiaries - filed by Susan Marie Rafferty Degaetano. (NO IFP, NO FEE PAID)(srs) |
Remark: Pro Se Privacy Notice, Magistrate Consent Notice, and Magistrate Consent Acknowledgement Sent to Pro Se Plaintiff. (srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.