Optinetix (Israel) LTD. v. Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc.
Optinetix (Israel) LTD. |
Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. |
1:2022cv01513 |
November 18, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Joel H Slomsky |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ozzie A. Farres, Michael A. Oakes, and Steven L. Wood for Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (smg) |
Filing 13 SO ORDERED, re #12 STIPULATION to Stay all Deadlines for 30 Days. Signed by Judge Joel H. Slomsky on 1/9/2023. (twk) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION to Stay all Deadlines for 30 Days by Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Ozzie A. Farres, Attorney Michael A. Oakes, and Attorney Steven L. Wood. Signed by Judge Joel H Slomsky on 1/9/2023. (apk) Modified on 1/11/2023 (smg). |
Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ozzie A. Farres, Attorney Michael A. Oakes, and Attorney Steven L. Wood - filed by Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
Filing 9 SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 12, 2023 filed by Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. Signed by Judge Joel H Slomsky on 12/12/2022. (srs) |
Filing 8 ORDER: DESIGNATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE TO HOLD A DISTRICT COURT WITHIN THE CIRCUIT, designating and assigning the Honorable Joel H. Slomsky of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Signed by Judge Michael A Chagares, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on 12/7/2022. (rjb) |
Case Reassigned to Judge Joel H Slomsky of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Please include the initials of the Judge (JHS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 12, 2023 - filed by Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Optinetix (Israel) LTD..Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. served on 11/22/2022, answer due 12/13/2022. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. on 11/21/2022. (vfm) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Optinetix (Israel) LTD.. (vfm) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,349,668. (vfm) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4008992.) - filed by Optinetix (Israel) LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Civil Cover Sheet) (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.