Parity Networks LLC v. Beijer Electronics Group AB et al
Parity Networks LLC |
Beijer Electronics Group AB, Beijer Electronics, Inc., Westermo Data Communications, Inc. and Korenix Technology Co., Ltd. |
1:2022cv01522 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Beijer Electronics, Inc. and Westermo Data Communications, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 3/13/2023 - filed by Parity Networks LLC. (Farnan, Brian) |
SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Beijer Electronics, Inc. and Westermo Data Communications, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 3/13/2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Beijer Electronics, Inc. answer due 3/13/2023; Westermo Data Communications, Inc. answer due 3/13/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/13/2022. (dlw) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Parity Networks LLC: For Beijer Electronics Group AB waiver sent on 12/12/2022, answer due 3/13/2023; Korenix Technology Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 12/12/2022, answer due 3/13/2023. (Farnan, Michael) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo for Parity Networks LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Adam G. Price for Parity Networks LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parity Networks LLC.Beijer Electronics, Inc. served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022. (Farnan, Brian) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parity Networks LLC.Westermo Data Communications, Inc. served on 11/22/2022, answer due 12/13/2022. (Farnan, Michael) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo and Adam G. Price - filed by Parity Networks LLC. (Farnan, Brian) |
SO ORDERED re (5 in 1:22-cv-01521-MN, 5 in 1:22-cv-01522-MN) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo and Adam G. Price filed by Parity Networks LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/29/2022. (dlw) |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01521-MN, 1:22-cv-01522-MN (rjb) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Beijer Electronics Group AB Beijer Electronics, Inc., Korenix Technology Co., Ltd., and Westermo Data Communications, Inc. on 11/21/2022. (srs) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,763,394 B2 ;US 6,870,844 B2 ;US 7,103,046 B2 ;US 7,107,352 B2 ;US 7,719,963 B2. (srs) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Beijer Electronics Group AB, Beijer Electronics, Inc., Korenix Technology Co., Ltd., Westermo Data Communications, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4009993.) - filed by Parity Networks LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.