Parity Networks LLC v. Beijer Electronics Group AB et al
Plaintiff: Parity Networks LLC
Defendant: Beijer Electronics Group AB, Beijer Electronics, Inc., Westermo Data Communications, Inc. and Korenix Technology Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2022cv01522
Filed: November 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2022 Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Beijer Electronics, Inc. and Westermo Data Communications, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 3/13/2023 - filed by Parity Networks LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
December 13, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Beijer Electronics, Inc. and Westermo Data Communications, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 3/13/2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Beijer Electronics, Inc. answer due 3/13/2023; Westermo Data Communications, Inc. answer due 3/13/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/13/2022. (dlw)
December 12, 2022 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Parity Networks LLC: For Beijer Electronics Group AB waiver sent on 12/12/2022, answer due 3/13/2023; Korenix Technology Co., Ltd. waiver sent on 12/12/2022, answer due 3/13/2023. (Farnan, Michael)
December 5, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo for Parity Networks LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr)
December 5, 2022 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Adam G. Price for Parity Networks LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr)
December 2, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parity Networks LLC.Beijer Electronics, Inc. served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
November 30, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Parity Networks LLC.Westermo Data Communications, Inc. served on 11/22/2022, answer due 12/13/2022. (Farnan, Michael)
November 29, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo and Adam G. Price - filed by Parity Networks LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re (5 in 1:22-cv-01521-MN, 5 in 1:22-cv-01522-MN) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew G. DiNovo and Adam G. Price filed by Parity Networks LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/29/2022. (dlw)
November 23, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-01521-MN, 1:22-cv-01522-MN (rjb)
November 21, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Beijer Electronics Group AB Beijer Electronics, Inc., Korenix Technology Co., Ltd., and Westermo Data Communications, Inc. on 11/21/2022. (srs)
November 21, 2022 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,763,394 B2 ;US 6,870,844 B2 ;US 7,103,046 B2 ;US 7,107,352 B2 ;US 7,719,963 B2. (srs)
November 21, 2022 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs)
November 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Beijer Electronics Group AB, Beijer Electronics, Inc., Korenix Technology Co., Ltd., Westermo Data Communications, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4009993.) - filed by Parity Networks LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(srs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Parity Networks LLC v. Beijer Electronics Group AB et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Parity Networks LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Represented By: Adam G. Price
Represented By: Andrew G. DiNovo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beijer Electronics Group AB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Beijer Electronics, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Westermo Data Communications, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Korenix Technology Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?