Johnson v. Metzger et al
| Jonathan Johnson |
| Warden Dana Metzger and Kathleen Jennings |
| 1:2022cv01567 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Stay - filed by Jonathan Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(apk) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Petitioner's Motion to Stay (D.I. #3 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice to renew. Petitioner must file a completed attached form 2254 application and the attached election form with the Court on or before January 13, 2023. (See Order for further details). (Notice of Compliance deadline set for 1/13/2023.). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/15/2022. (Attachments: #1 AEDPA Election Form, #2 2254 application) (lah)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Stay - filed by Jonathan Johnson. (lam) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - filed by Jonathan Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Memorandum, #3 Order) (Opened per D.I. 86 in 06-cr-74-GBW-1) (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
