NovaSparks, Inc. v. Exegy Inc.
NovaSparks, Inc. |
Exegy Inc. |
1:2023cv00006 |
January 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to March 9, 2023 - filed by Exegy Inc.. (Squire, Monte) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Matthew L. Cutler,Glenn E. Forbis,J. Bradley Luchsinger,Michael J. Thomas for Exegy Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael J. Thomas - filed by Exegy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney J. Bradley Luchsinger - filed by Exegy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Glenn E. Forbis - filed by Exegy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Matthew L. Cutler - filed by Exegy Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte) |
![]() |
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to February 23, 2023 - filed by Exegy Inc.. (Squire, Monte) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Monte Terrell Squire on behalf of Exegy Inc. (Squire, Monte) |
![]() |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Stephen M. Ullmer, Nicholas A. Brown, and Andrew J. Tibbetts for NovaSparks, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr) |
![]() |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew J. Tibbetts, Nicholas A. Brown and Stephen M. Ullmer - filed by NovaSparks, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification by Counsel to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Andrew J. Tibbetts, Esq., #2 Certification by Counsel to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Nicholas A. Brown, Esq., #3 Certification by Counsel to Be Admitted Pro Hac Vice - Stephen M. Ulmer, Esq.)(Schladweiler, Benjamin) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NovaSparks, Inc..Exegy Inc. served on 1/3/2023, answer due 1/24/2023. (Schladweiler, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Exegy Inc. on 1/3/2023. (smg) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent NovaSparks SAS, Corporate Parent FinaSparks SAS for NovaSparks, Inc. filed by NovaSparks, Inc. (smg) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,904,931. (smg) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (smg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed with Jury Demand against Exegy Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4035084.) - filed by NovaSparks, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(smg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.