Walker v. Jensen et al
Russell E. Scott Walker and Scott Walker |
Rick Jensen and Forever Media, Inc. |
1:2023cv00059 |
January 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 filed by Russell E. Scott Walker, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/3/2023. (nmf) |
Filing 5 ORDER, denying request to proceed informa pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the $402.00 filing fee within 30-days or the case shall be dismissed.. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 01/26/2023. (vfm) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00058-CFC, 1:23-cv-00059-CFC (rjb) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Russell E. Scott Walker. (srs) |
Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Forever Media, Inc. and Rick Jensen (IFP Filed/Pending) - filed by Russell E. Scott Walker. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement of Magistrate Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mkr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Russell E. Scott Walker. (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.