Residential Warranty Services, Inc. et al v. Porch.com, Inc. et al
| Residential Warranty Services, Inc. and P. Nathan Thornberry |
| Porch.com, Inc. and Porch Group, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00240 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CASE CLOSED (ntl) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Residential Warranty Services, Inc., P. Nathan Thornberry (Burton, William) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Porch Group, Inc.; Porch.com, Inc. on 3/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(twk) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Residential Warranty Services, Inc. (twk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages filed against Porch Group, Inc., Porch.com, Inc. (Filing fee $402, receipt number ADEDC-4081588.) - filed by Residential Warranty Services, Inc., P. Nathan Thornberry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
