Malcolm v. ServPro of Bear/New Castle et al
| Natoya Malcolm |
| ServPro of Bear/New Castle and Richard Massey |
| 1:2023cv00268 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: The complaints are DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE each case (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/17/2023. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00269-RGA, 1:23-cv-00268-RGA (lah) Modified on 3/20/2023 (nms).
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) (Main Document 3 replaced on 3/14/2023) (jfm). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed against Richard Massey, ServPro of Bear/New Castle - filed by Natoya Malcolm. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/14/2023: #2 Acknowledgement of Consent Form) (jfm). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Natoya Malcolm. (jfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
