Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Video Network Security LLC
| Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. |
| Video Network Security LLC |
| 1:2023cv00337 |
| March 26, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Letter to Judge Richard G. Andrews, from Paul J. Napoli, Esq., regarding dissociation of Napoli Shkolnik LLC from Plaintiff's counsel. (apk) |
| Filing 10 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,473,527; 6,972,790; 8,537,242. (Attachments: #1 Order)(nms) |
Filing 9
SO ORDERED Granting #8 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/16/2023. (nms)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. as to Video Network Security LLC (deBruin, David) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.. (deBruin, David) Modified on 4/14/2023 (nms). |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Video Network Security LLC answer due 5/17/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/14/2023. (nms)
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc..Video Network Security LLC served on 3/27/2023, answer due 4/17/2023. (deBruin, David) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00336-UNA, 1:23-cv-00337-UNA(nms) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Video Network Security LLC on 3/27/2023. (twk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (twk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,473,527; 6,972,790; 8,537,242. (twk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Video Network Security LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4097546.) - filed by Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Appearance of Counsel, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Video Network Security LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David W. deBruin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Video Network Security LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
