Lewis v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Plaintiff: Racquel Lewis
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Department of Defense
Case Number: 1:2023cv00442
Filed: April 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting the Court close the case (D.I. #9 ), which the Court construes as a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/3/2023. (nms)
May 2, 2023 Filing 9 [SEALED] MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Racquel Lewis. (mkr) Modified on 5/3/2023 (nms).
May 2, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Seal all requests, claims, and evidence filed on 5/2/2023 - filed by Racquel Lewis. (mkr)
April 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (D.I. #2 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/26/2023. (lah)
April 26, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
April 25, 2023 Filing 6 [SEALED] AMENDED COMPLAINT against Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Defense- filed by Racquel Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Exhibits, #2 Motion to Amend, #3 Motion to Amend Exhibit 1, #4 Motion to Amend Exhibit 2)(smg)
April 25, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION to Seal the Complaint and All Supporting Documents - filed by Racquel Lewis. (smg)
April 21, 2023 Filing 4 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb)
April 21, 2023 Filing 3 [SEALED] COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Department of Homeland Security - filed by Racquel Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Privacy Violations; Fraud; Retaliation, #6 Acknowledgement of Consent Form, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb)
April 21, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Racquel Lewis. (mpb)
April 21, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION to Seal - filed by Racquel Lewis. (mpb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lewis v. Department of Homeland Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Racquel Lewis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Defense
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?