Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc.
| Digital Verification Systems, LLC |
| Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00455 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,054,860. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(kmd) |
| CASE CLOSED per #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (kmd) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Digital Verification Systems, LLC as to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) and 41(a)(1)(B) (Phillips, John) |
ORAL ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that on or before June 5, 2023, the parties shall either (1) submit to the Clerk of Court an executed Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge, indicating their consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case including trial, the entry of final judgment, and post-trial proceedings; or (2) file a joint letter indicating that all the parties do not consent to a referral of this action to a Magistrate Judge. The letter should not indicate which party or parties did not consent. If all the parties consent, the case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Burke. Because of the Court's caseload, if the parties do not consent, the Court intends to assign the case to a visiting judge from another district. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/22/2023. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00455-CFC, 1:23-cv-00456-CFC, 1:23-cv-00458-CFC(nmf)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Agreed Upon), filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. Reset Answer Deadlines: Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. answer due 6/15/2023. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/16/2023. (kmd)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint (Agreed Upon) - filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. (Phillips, John) |
| Filing 8 STANDING ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING IN ALL CASES Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00455-CFC, 1:23-cv-00456-CFC, 1:23-cv-00458-CFC(nmf) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Rene A. Vazquez for Digital Verification Systems, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00455-CFC, 1:23-cv-00456-CFC, 1:23-cv-00458-CFC(mpb) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC.Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. served on 4/25/2023, answer due 5/16/2023. (Phillips, John) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. #7 Deleted, Counsel is advised to refile proof of service with the correct dates. (jfm) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Rene A. Vazquez - filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Rene A. Vazquez)(Haney, Megan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00455-CFC, 1:23-cv-00456-CFC, 1:23-cv-00458-CFC (rjb) |
|
SO ORDERED, re ( #6 in 1:23-cv-00456-CFC, 1:23-cv-00455-CFC, 1:23-cv-00458-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Rene A. Vazquez, filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/26/2023. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00455-CFC, 1:23-cv-00456-CFC, 1:23-cv-00458-CFC (kmd)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. on 4/25/2023. (vfm) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Patent Asset Management, LLC for Digital Verification Systems, LLC filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. (vfm) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,054,860. (vfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4120221.) - filed by Digital Verification Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Digital Verification Systems, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Megan C. Haney |
| Represented By: | John C. Phillips, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Rene A. Vazquez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kdan Mobile Software America, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
