Watchy Technology Private Limited v. Dejero Inc. et al
Watchy Technology Private Limited |
Dejero Inc. and Dejero Labs Inc. |
1:2023cv00462 |
April 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Dejero Inc. and Dejero Labs Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to Watchy's Complaint (D.I. 1) to August 19, 2023 filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Dejero Inc. answer due 8/19/2023; Dejero Labs Inc. answer due 8/19/2023. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/20/2023. (nmf) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Dejero Inc. and Dejero Labs Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to Watchy's Complaint (D.I. 1) to August 19, 2023 - filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shea N. Palavan - filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Shea N. Palavan)(Bilson, David) |
SO ORDERED, re ( #9 in 1:23-cv-00462-CFC and 1:23-cv-00463-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shea N. Palavan, filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/30/2023. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00463-CFC, 1:23-cv-00462-CFC (kmd) |
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Shea N. Palavan for Watchy Technology Private Limited added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk) |
Filing 8 STATEMENT Regarding Third-Party Litigation Funding Arrangements by Watchy Technology Private Limited. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Dejero Inc. and Dejero Labs Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to June 19, 2023 - filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. (Phillips, John) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Dejero Inc. and Dejero Labs Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to June 19, 2023, filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. Reset Answer Deadlines: Dejero Inc. answer due 6/19/2023; Dejero Labs Inc. answer due 6/19/2023. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/17/2023. (kmd) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00462-CFC, 1:23-cv-00463-CFC (rjb) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Watchy Technology Private Limited.Dejero Inc. served on 4/27/2023, answer due 5/18/2023. (Phillips, John) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Dejero Inc. on 4/26/2023; Dejero Labs Inc. on 4/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued) (vfm) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. (vfm) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,454,726. (vfm) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Dejero Inc., Dejero Labs Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4121875.) - filed by Watchy Technology Private Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.