Edelmann et al v. John Doe New Castle County Police Officer No. 1 et al
| Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones and Aida Pabon |
| John Doe New Castle County Police Officer No. 1, Vaughan M. Bond, Jr. and New Castle County |
| 1:2023cv00572 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Nicholas J. Brannick as Counsel for Defendants Bond and New Castle County by Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, New Castle County (Brannick, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Time for Defendants Vaughan M. Bond, Jr. and New Castle County to Answer to August 14, 2023 - filed by Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, New Castle County. (Davis, Wilson) |
SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Time for Defendants Vaughan M. Bond, Jr. and New Castle County to Answer to August 14, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Vaughan M. Bond, Jr answer due 8/14/2023; New Castle County answer due 8/14/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 7/12/2023. (dlw)
|
|
SO ORDERED re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. MacMain, #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian C. Conley filed by New Castle County, Vaughan M. Bond, Jr. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/15/2023. (dlw)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David J. MacMain - filed by Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, New Castle County. (Brannick, Nicholas) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian C. Conley - filed by Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, New Castle County. (Brannick, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Jaison Brannick on behalf of Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, New Castle County (Brannick, Nicholas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Wilson Buckmaster Davis on behalf of Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, New Castle County (Davis, Wilson) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joseph M. Marrone and Michael D. Pomerantz for Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones, and Aida Pabon added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph M. Marrone - filed by Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones, Aida Pabon. (Sharma, Aman) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael D. Pomerantz - filed by Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones, Aida Pabon. (Sharma, Aman) |
|
SO ORDERED re #4 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph M. Marrone, #3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael D. Pomerantz filed by Aida Pabon, Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/13/2023. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Vaughan M. Bond, Jr, John Doe New Castle County Police Officer No. 1, and New Castle County (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4144309.) - filed by Craig Edelmann, Elizabeth Jones, and Aida Pabon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) |
| No Summons Issued. (jfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
