Focus Global Solutions LLC v. Rockwell Automation, Inc.
| Focus Global Solutions LLC |
| Rockwell Automation, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00782 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,978,301. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(kmd) |
| CASE CLOSED per #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (kmd) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Focus Global Solutions LLC as to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Phillips, John) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Plead - filed by Focus Global Solutions LLC. (Phillips, John) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Otherwise Plead, filed by Focus Global Solutions LLC. Reset Answer Deadlines: Rockwell Automation, Inc. answer due 9/8/2023. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/2/2023. (kmd)
|
| Filing 8 Amended Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Focus Global Solutions LLC. (Phillips, John) |
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING IN ALL CASES (nmf) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Focus Global Solutions LLC.Rockwell Automation, Inc. served on 7/19/2023, answer due 8/9/2023. (Phillips, John) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rockwell Automation, Inc. on 7/18/2023. (vfm) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Focus Global Solutions LLC. (vfm) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,978,301. (vfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Rockwell Automation, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4181363.) - filed by Focus Global Solutions LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Focus Global Solutions LLC v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Focus Global Solutions LLC | |
| Represented By: | John C. Phillips, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Megan C. Haney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Rockwell Automation, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
