NJOY, LLC v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff: NJOY, LLC
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv00917
Filed: August 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING #11 UNOPPOSED Motion to Stay Pending Determination by the International Trade Commission. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/10/2023. (dlw)
October 10, 2023 Filing 11 UNOPPOSED MOTION to Stay Pending Determination by the International Trade Commission - filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 10/10/2023 (dlw).
October 4, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael T. Renaud, Adam S. Rizk, and Matthew A. Karambelas - filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy)
October 4, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael T. Renaud, Adam S. Rizk, and Matthew A. Karambelas filed by JUUL Labs, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/4/2023. (dlw)
October 4, 2023 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Elizabeth S. Weiswasser, Matthew D. Sieger, Adrian C. Percer, Christopher M. Pepe, Anish G. Desai, Matthew D. Sieger, and W. Sutton Ansley for NJOY, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr)
September 29, 2023 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Alysha Bohanon, Beth Wilkinson, Brian L. Stekloff, and James Rosenthal for NJOY, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr)
September 13, 2023 Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff NJOY, LLC's Complaint for Patent Infringement to October 30, 2023 - filed by JUUL Labs, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy)
September 13, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc. to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff NJOY, LLC's Complaint for Patent Infringement to October 30, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: JUUL Labs, Inc. answer due 10/30/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/13/2023. (dlw)
September 12, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Beth Wilkinson, Brian L. Stekloff, James Rosenthal, and Alysha Bohanon - filed by NJOY, LLC. (Vavala, Donald)
September 12, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher M. Pepe, Matthew D. Sieger, and Adrian C. Percer - filed by NJOY, LLC. (Vavala, Donald)
September 12, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser, Anish R. Desai, and W. Sutton Ansley - filed by NJOY, LLC. (Vavala, Donald)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Elizabeth Stotland Weiswasser, Anish R. Desai, and W. Sutton Ansley, #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher M. Pepe, Matthew D. Sieger, and Adrian C. Percer, #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Beth Wilkinson, Brian L. Stekloff, James Rosenthal, and Alysha Bohanon filed by NJOY, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/12/2023. (dlw)
August 30, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
August 23, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by NJOY, LLC.JUUL Labs, Inc. served on 8/23/2023, answer due 9/13/2023. (Wilks, David)
August 22, 2023 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Altria Group, Inc. for NJOY, LLC filed by NJOY, LLC. (mpb)
August 22, 2023 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,334,881 ;11,497,864. (mpb)
August 22, 2023 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb)
August 22, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Juul Labs, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4206661.) - filed by NJOY, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb)
August 22, 2023 No Summons Issued. (mpb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NJOY, LLC v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NJOY, LLC
Represented By: Donald C. Vavala, III
Represented By: David E. Wilks
Represented By: Matthew D. Sieger
Represented By: Adrian C. Percer
Represented By: Alysha Bohanon
Represented By: Anish G. Desai
Represented By: Beth Wilkinson
Represented By: Brian L. Stekloff
Represented By: Christopher M. Pepe
Represented By: Elizabeth S. Weiswasser
Represented By: James Rosenthal
Represented By: W. Sutton Ansley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc.
Represented By: Jeremy A. Tigan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?