978 Tech N.V. v. 8xbet.kim et al
978 Tech N.V. |
8xbet.kim, 8xbet.max, 8xbett.art, 8xbet.ltd and Google LLC |
1:2023cv00928 |
August 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 Letter to 978 Tech N.V., from the Clerk of Court, regarding deficiencies identified with submitted filings at D.I. #1 . (vfm) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT filed Pro Se against 8xbet.kim, 8xbet.ltd, 8xbet.max, 8xbett.art, Google LLC ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 1406.) - filed by 978 Tech N.V.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-F) (vfm) |
Remark: A Copy of the Complaint, Magistrate Consent Form and Privacy Notice has been mailed to the Pro Se filer. (vfm) |
No Summons Issued. (vfm) |
DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.