Chrustowski v. USPS - Middletown Post Office
Renee A. Chrustowski |
USPS - Middletown Post Office |
1:2023cv01027 |
September 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Colm F Connolly |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA for the Third Circuit re #9 Notice of Appeal to the Third Circuit filed by Renee A. Chrustowski. USCA Case Number 23-2926. USCA Case Manager: James (DOCUMENT IS RESTRICTED AND CAN ONLY BE VIEWED BY COURT STAFF) (jk) |
Filing 10 NOTICE OF MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Renee A. Chrustowski. (smg) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Third Circuit of #8 Order Dismissing Case. (No IFP, Fee Not Paid) - Appeal filed by Renee A. Chrustowski. (jfm) |
Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: 1. The motions to consolidate are DENIED. 2. These three cases are DISMISSED without prejudice. 3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. (copy to pltf.) (CASE CLOSED) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/17/2023. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00745-CFC, 1:23-cv-00887-CFC, 1:23-cv-01027-CFC(nmf) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Consolidate Cases - filed by Renee A. Chrustowski. (vfm) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Renee A. Chrustowski. (vfm) |
Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT PURCHASE ORDER - filed by Renee A. Chrustowski (mkr) |
Filing 4 ORDER, Plaintiff shall, within twenty-one days from the date of this order, either: (1) submit a long form (AO Form 239) application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs (in forma pauperis), or (2) pay in full the $402.00 filing fee. Failure to timely comply with this order shall result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Notice of Compliance deadline set for 10/19/2023. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/28/2023. (twk) |
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of AO Form 85 Magistrate Consent Form. Acknowledgment filed by Renee A. Chrustowski. (twk) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against USPS - Middletown Post Office - filed by Renee A. Chrustowski. (No Fee Paid, No IFP). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(twk) |
Remark: Magistrate Consent Form, Pro-Se Privacy Notice mailed to Pro-Se plaintiff. (twk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chrustowski v. USPS - Middletown Post Office | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Renee A. Chrustowski | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USPS - Middletown Post Office | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.