Thomas v. PCF Investments
1:2023cv01047 |
April 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Wilmington Office |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MEMORANDUM ORDER: The relief sought in the Notice (D.I. 12 ) and Motion to Shorten (D.I. 15 ) is DENIED. The following schedule shall govern briefing of the merits of the appeal: ( Appellant Brief due by 5/30/2024., Appellee Brief due by 7/1/2024., Appellant Reply Brief due by 7/15/2024.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/30/2024. (nmf) |
Filing 21 ORDER Withdrawing the Bankruptcy Appeal from Mediation re 20 Recommendation. A briefing schedule shall be set, if appropriate, following disposition of appellant's pending motion. (D.I. 15 ) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/25/2024. (nmf) |
Filing 20 Recommendation that Bankruptcy Appeal be withdrawn from mandatory mediation. The parties should address any request for entry of a briefing schedule to the assigned District Judge in this matter. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/22/2024. (nmf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Thomas v. PCF Investments | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.