Peters v. Kaleyra, Inc.
Plaintiff: William Peters
Defendant: Kaleyra, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv01051
Filed: September 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2023 Filing 14 REQUEST for Oral Argument by William Peters re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration, #8 MOTION Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration re #6 MOTION to Compel. (Sauder, Andrew) Modified on 11/22/2023 (dlw).
November 21, 2023 Filing 13 REPLY BRIEF re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration filed by Kaleyra, Inc. (Green, Jared) Modified on 11/22/2023 (dlw).
November 14, 2023 Filing 12 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration, #8 MOTION Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration re #6 MOTION to Compel filed by William Peters. Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 11/21/2023. (Sauder, Andrew) Modified on 11/14/2023 (dlw).
November 3, 2023 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brandon A. Carmack for William Peters added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mkr)
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brandon A. Carmack filed by William Peters. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/2/2023. (dlw)
November 1, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brandon A. Carmack - filed by William Peters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification by Counsel to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (Brandon A. Carmack)))(Sauder, Andrew)
November 1, 2023 CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 7 has been replaced on the docket. The footnotes now appear in 12-point font as required by Judge Noreika's Preferences and Procedures. (dlw)
October 31, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark Romeo and James Becerra - filed by Kaleyra, Inc.. (Green, Jared)
October 31, 2023 Filing 9 DECLARATION of Mark Romeo in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration by Kaleyra, Inc. (Green, Jared) Modified on 10/31/2023 (dlw).
October 31, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION Request for Judicial Notice in Support of #6 Motion to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration - filed by Kaleyra, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 5)(Green, Jared) Modified on 10/31/2023 (dlw).
October 31, 2023 Filing 7 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration filed by Kaleyra, Inc. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/14/2023. (Green, Jared) Modified on 10/31/2023 (dlw). (Main Document 7 replaced on 11/1/2023) (dlw).
October 31, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss and Compel Arbitration - filed by Kaleyra, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Green, Jared) Modified on 10/31/2023 (dlw).
October 31, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jared Thomas Green on behalf of Kaleyra, Inc. (Green, Jared)
October 31, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark Romeo and James Becerra filed by Kaleyra, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/31/2023. (dlw)
October 17, 2023 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ronald J. Schutz for William Peters added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)
October 5, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED re #3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ronald J. Schutz filed by William Peters. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/5/2023. (dlw)
October 4, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
October 2, 2023 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by William Peters.Kaleyra, Inc. served on 10/2/2023, answer due 10/23/2023. (Sauder, Andrew)
September 28, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ronald J. Schutz - filed by William Peters. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certification by Counsel to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (Ronald J. Schutz))(Sauder, Andrew)
September 26, 2023 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr)
September 26, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Kaleyra, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4232742.) - filed by William Peters. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mkr)
September 26, 2023 No Summons Issued. (mkr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peters v. Kaleyra, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Peters
Represented By: Andrew Hall Sauder
Represented By: Brandon A. Carmack
Represented By: Ronald J. Schutz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaleyra, Inc.
Represented By: Jared Thomas Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?