Pacira BioSciences, Inc. v. Ventis Pharma, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
Defendant: Ventis Pharma, Inc. and InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv01250
Filed: November 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2023 Filing 17 DECLARATION re #14 Opening Brief in Support, #13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction [Declaration of Paul W. Garrity in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction] by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Ralston, Brian)
December 29, 2023 Filing 16 DECLARATION re #14 Opening Brief in Support, #13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction [Declaration of John Spranger in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction] by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-N)(Ralston, Brian)
December 29, 2023 Filing 15 DECLARATION re #14 Opening Brief in Support, #13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction [Declaration of Matthew Carangelo in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction] by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Ralston, Brian)
December 29, 2023 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/12/2024. (Ralston, Brian)
December 29, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction - filed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Rule 7.1.1. Certificate)(Ralston, Brian)
December 29, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carrie Richey - filed by Ventis Pharma, Inc.. (Riley, Stephanie)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carrie Richey, filed by Ventis Pharma, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/29/2023. (nms)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #11 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. answer due 1/12/2024). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/4/2023. (nms)
December 1, 2023 Filing 11 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint - filed by InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.. (Higgins, James) Modified on 12/4/2023 (nms).
November 28, 2023 Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Paul W. Garrity, Scott S. Liebman, and Imad Matini for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
November 28, 2023 Pro Hac Vice Attorneys A. Joseph Jay, III and Paul Werner for Pacira BioSciences, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint wise respond to the Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. answer due 12/27/2023). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/27/2023. (nms)
November 22, 2023 Filing 10 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint - filed by InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.. (Hallowell, Taylor) Modified on 11/22/2023 (nms).
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time - filed by Ventis Pharma, Inc.. (Riley, Stephanie) Modified on 11/20/2023 (nms).
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION and Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Ventis Pharma, Inc. answer due 1/12/2024). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/20/2023. (nms)
November 17, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie S. Riley on behalf of Ventis Pharma, Inc. (Riley, Stephanie)
November 14, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul W. Garrity, Scott S. Liebman, Paul Werner, A. Joseph Jay, III, and Imad Matini of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP - filed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. (Ralston, Brian)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul W. Garrity, Scott S. Liebman, Paul Werner, A. Joseph Jay, III, and Imad Matini of Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, filed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/14/2023. (nms)
November 8, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. All Defendants. (Ralston, Brian)
November 8, 2023 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
November 8, 2023 CORRECTING ENTRY: The summons returned executed and filed at D.I. 4 has been removed from the docket as it was filed using an incorrect code. Counsel is to refile the executed summons using the "Summons Returned Executed" code thereby allowing an Answer due date to be established. (nms)
November 3, 2023 Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc.. (Ralston, Brian)
November 3, 2023 DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (mkr)
November 1, 2023 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to InfuSystem Holdings, Inc. on 11/1/2023; and Ventis Pharma, Inc. on 11/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(mkr)
November 1, 2023 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr)
November 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF filed with Jury Demand against InfuSystem Holdings, Inc., and Ventis Pharma, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4263455.) - filed by Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (mkr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacira BioSciences, Inc. v. Ventis Pharma, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
Represented By: Brian C. Ralston
Represented By: David Alden Seal
Represented By: A. Joseph Jay, III
Represented By: Imad Matini
Represented By: Paul W. Garrity
Represented By: Paul Werner
Represented By: Scott S. Liebman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ventis Pharma, Inc.
Represented By: Stephanie S. Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: InfuSystem Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: James L. Higgins
Represented By: Taylor E. Hallowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?