Wing v. Gray et al
| Gregory Wing |
| Lt. Gray and Mental Health Services |
| 1:2023cv01336 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The time period has lapsed, and to date Plaintiff has not submitted the authorization form. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 1/9/2024. (lah)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: The Motion to Proceed IFP (D.I. #1 ) is GRANTED. A filing Fee of $350.00 is assessed. Plaintiff shall submit trust fund account statement. Failure to submit items within 30 days will result in dismissal of action without prejudice (*Notice of Compliance deadline set for 12/27/2023) (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/27/2023. (lah) Modified on 11/28/2023 (nms).
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 against Gray, Mental Health Services - filed by Gregory Wing. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Gregory Wing. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
