DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Allied Telesis, Inc.
| DataCloud Technologies, LLC |
| Allied Telesis, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01451 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 13, 2024 filed by Allied Telesis, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/7/24. (ntl)
|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 13, 2024 - filed by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Dorsney, Kenneth) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. McDonough, III and Jonathan R. Miller filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/3/24. (ntl)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys James F. McDonough, III and Jonathan R. Miller for DataCloud Technologies, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
| Filing 10 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Jonathan R. Miller. ( re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. McDonough, III and Jonathan R. Miller )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4305092).(Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for James F. McDonough III. ( re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. McDonough, III and Jonathan R. Miller )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4305091).(Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney James F. McDonough, III and Jonathan R. Miller - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 12, 2024 filed by Allied Telesis, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/29/23. (ntl)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Allied Telesis, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 12, 2024 - filed by Allied Telesis, Inc.. (Hitch, Cortlan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC.Allied Telesis, Inc. served on 12/22/2023, answer due 1/12/2024. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Allied Telesis, Inc. on 12/20/2023. (jfm) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DataCloud Technologies, LLC filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (jfm) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,139,780 B2; US 7,209,959 B1; US 7,398,298 B2; US 8,156,499 B2; US 8,370,457 B2. (jfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FORT PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Allied Telesis, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4299419.) - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
