Data Resonance LLC v. Informatica Inc.
| Data Resonance LLC |
| Informatica Inc. |
| 1:2023cv01473 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, granting #10 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer, or otherwise plead, to Plaintiff's Complaint. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Informatica Inc. answer due 3/11/2024). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/23/2024. (ceg)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or otherwise plead to Plaintiff's Complaint - filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Data Resonance LLC.Informatica Inc. served on 1/19/2024, answer due 2/9/2024. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Isaac Philip Rabicoff. ( re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicoff )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4306824).(Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicoff - filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 6 Amended Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicoff, filed by Data Resonance LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/4/2024. (kmd)
|
| Filing 5 STANDING ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING IN ALL CASES (nmf) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,934,714. (mkr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGMENT filed with Jury Demand against Informatica Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4302371.) - filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Appearance of Counsel, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (mkr) |
| No Summons Issued. (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Data Resonance LLC v. Informatica Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Data Resonance LLC | |
| Represented By: | Antranig N. Garibian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Informatica Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
