In Re: Rust Family Office
| Rust Family Office |
| Pimpaktra Rust |
| 1:2023mc00143 |
| March 7, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of The Rust Family Office's Notice of Subsequent Binding Ruling by Rust Family Office re #1 MOTION to Quash (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brown, Jamie) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Oral Argument by Rust Family Office re #1 MOTION to Quash, #7 MOTION to Compel \\ Plaintiffs Counter-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition as to Non-Party Rust Family Office and Tom Roletter. (Brown, Jamie) |
| Filing 11 REPLY BRIEF re #7 MOTION to Compel \\ Plaintiffs Counter-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition as to Non-Party Rust Family Office and Tom Roletter filed by Pimpaktra Rust. (Bellew, Sean) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Jamie L. Brown re #9 Reply Brief, in further support of its Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena and Answering Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel filed by Rust Family Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DD-OO)(Brown, Jamie) |
| Filing 9 REPLY BRIEF re #1 MOTION to Quash, #7 MOTION to Compel \\ Plaintiffs Counter-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition as to Non-Party Rust Family Office and Tom Roletter and Answering Brief in Opposition to the Counter-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena filed by Rust Family Office. (Brown, Jamie) |
| Filing 8 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #1 MOTION to Quash, #7 MOTION to Compel \\ Plaintiffs Counter-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition as to Non-Party Rust Family Office and Tom Roletter filed by Pimpaktra Rust.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 4/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K)(Bellew, Sean) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Compel \\ Plaintiffs Counter-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Subpoena for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition as to Non-Party Rust Family Office and Tom Roletter - filed by Pimpaktra Rust. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bellew, Sean) |
SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME To Respond to Petitioner's Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena to March 28, 2023 filed by Pimpaktra Rust. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/27/23. (ntl)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME To Respond to Petitioner's Motion to Quash Non-Party Subpoena to March 28, 2023 - filed by Pimpaktra Rust. (Bellew, Sean) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Rust Family Office for Rust Family Office filed by Rust Family Office. (Brown, Jamie) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean J. Bellew on behalf of Pimpaktra Rust (Bellew, Sean) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of Jamie L. Brown in support of D.I. #1 MOTION to Quash Non-Party Subpoena filed by Rust Family Office. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-M, #2 Exhibit N-CC)(mpb) |
| Filing 2 OPENING BRIEF in Support D.I. #1 MOTION to Quash Non-Party Subpoena filed by Rust Family Office.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/21/2023. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Non-Party Subpoena - filed by Rust Family Office. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Miscellaneous Filing Fee $49 paid. Receipt number ADEDC-4084002)(mpb) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (mpb) |
| Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial case assignment. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: In Re: Rust Family Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rust Family Office | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Taylor Hirzel, II |
| Represented By: | Jamie Lynne Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Pimpaktra Rust | |
| Represented By: | Sean J. Bellew |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
