In re: Animo Investments Texas, LLC
| Animo Investments Texas, LLC and Valena Glenvalley |
| United States |
| 1:2023mc00215 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: The case is DISMISSED without prejudice (see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/19/2023. (nms)
|
| CASE CLOSED per D.I. #3 . (nms) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The Petitioner has until May 17, 2023, to obtain counsel, including Delaware counsel. If counsel fails to enter an appearance by May 17, 2023, the case will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 4/19/2023. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION/PETITION to Quash IRS Summons (Filing Fee $49, Rec# 970) - filed by Animo Investments Texas, LLC. (Attachments: #1 IRS Summons, #2 Envelope)(smg) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE by the Court issued to Animo Investments Texas, LLC re D.I. #1 Motion to Quash. Pursuant to Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-03(1993), companies/corporations cannot proceed pro se (smg) |
| Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. Copy of docket sheet mailed to pro se filer. (smg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
