ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. et al v. Reolink Innovation Inc. et al
| ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. and ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. |
| Reolink Innovation Inc., Reolink Innovation Co., Ltd, Amazon.com Inc., eBay Inc., Home Depot USA Inc., Micro Center Inc. and Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00169 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., ThroughTEK Co., Ltd..Amazon.com Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024; Home Depot USA Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024; Micro Center Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024; Reolink Innovation Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024; Walmart Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024; eBay Inc. served on 3/26/2024, answer due 4/16/2024. (O'Rourke, Gerard) |
SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew C. Aitken filed by ThroughTEK Co., Ltd., ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.; #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Justin King filed by ThroughTEK Co., Ltd., ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/26/24. (ntl)
|
| Filing 10 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Andrew C. Aitken. ( re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew C. Aitken )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4346200).(O'Rourke, Gerard) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Andrew C. Aitken - filed by ThroughTEK Co., Ltd., ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.. (O'Rourke, Gerard) |
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Justin King. ( re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Justin King )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4345175).(O'Rourke, Gerard) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Justin King - filed by ThroughTEK Co., Ltd., ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.. (O'Rourke, Gerard) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (vfm) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by ThroughTEK Co., Ltd.. (vfm) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent ThroughTEK Co., Ltd. for ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. filed by ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.. (vfm) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,774,916; 10,602,448. (vfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Amazon.com Inc., Home Depot USA Inc., Micro Center Inc., Reolink Innovation Co., Ltd, Reolink Innovation Inc., Walmart Inc., eBay Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4334034.) - filed by ThroughTEK Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., ThroughTEK Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet) (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
