Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd. et al v. KyLin TV, Inc.
| Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. and Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. |
| KyLin TV, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv00252 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Clerk's Entry of Default served on KyLin TV, Inc. on 4/5/2024, filed by Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Connolly, Arthur) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to KyLin TV, Inc. - Re: #8 Request for Default filed by Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd. (ceg) |
| Filing 10 Letter to The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Arthur G. Connolly, III regarding Status Report. (Connolly, Arthur) Modified on 3/25/2024 (ceg). |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Arthur G. Connolly, III, Esquire re #8 REQUEST for Default as to KyLin TV, Inc. filed by Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Connolly, Arthur) |
| Filing 8 REQUEST for Default as to KyLin TV, Inc. - filed by Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Connolly, Arthur) |
Filing 7
ORAL ORDER: Defendant's answer was due to be filed on March 18, 2024 (see D.I. #6 ), and to date none has been filed. Plaintiff is to file a status letter no later than 3 days from the date of this Order. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/20/2024. (ceg)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd..KyLin TV, Inc. served on 2/26/2024, answer due 3/18/2024. (Connolly, Arthur) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to KyLin TV, Inc. on 2/23/2024. (nmg) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Morespark Limited, Other Affiliate Tencent Holdings for Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.; Corporate Parent Shenzhen Tencent Enterprise Management Co., Ltd. for Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd. filed by Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (nmg) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Register of Copyrights for Copyright Number(s)See Attached. (Report has been mailed to the U.S. Copyright office). (nmg) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against KyLin TV, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4346699.) - filed by Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd., Shanghai Tencent Penguin Film Culture Media Co., Ltd., and Tencent Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (nmg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
