Moore v. Xos, Inc. et al
| Jon Moore |
| Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson, Stuart Bernstein, Alice K. Jackson, Burt Jordan, Ed Rapp and Giordano Sordoni |
| 1:2024cv00270 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Securities/Commodities |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jon Moore (Long, Brian) |
| CASE CLOSED (dlw) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00270-MN, 1:24-cv-00282-MN (rjb) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: deleted previous entry assigning case - entry was incomplete. Will docket assignment of this case in a subsequent entry. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00270-UNA, 1:24-cv-00282-UNA(rjb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS filed with Jury Demand against Stuart Bernstein, Alice K. Jackson, Burt Jordan, George N. Mattson, Ed Rapp, Dakota Semler, Giordano Sordoni, and Xos, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4351117.) - filed by Jon Moore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (mkr) |
| No Summons Issued. (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
