Earin AB v. Skullcandy, Inc.
Earin AB |
Skullcandy, Inc. |
1:2024cv00275 |
March 1, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Delaware |
Richard G Andrews |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Skullcandy, Inc.. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/13/2024. (Stover, Chad) Modified on 4/29/2024 (nms). |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Stover, Chad) Modified on 4/29/2024 (nms). |
Filing 9 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Skullcandy, Inc.. (Stover, Chad) Modified on 3/25/2024 (nms). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Chad S.C. Stover on behalf of Skullcandy, Inc. (Stover, Chad) |
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Katherine Bentfield, Alexandra Fellowes, and Cristofer I. Leffler for Earin AB added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00274-RGA, 1:24-cv-00275-RGA(mpb) |
Filing 7 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Alexandra Fellowes, Cristofer I. Leffler, and Katherine Bentfield. ( re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra Fellowes, Cristofer I. Leffler, and Katherine Bentfield )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4355936).(Farnan, Brian) |
|
Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra Fellowes, Cristofer I. Leffler, and Katherine Bentfield - filed by Earin AB. (Farnan, Brian) |
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00274-RGA, 1:24-cv-00275-RGA (rjb) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Skullcandy, Inc. on 3/1/2024. (mkr) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Earin AB. (mkr) |
Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 9,402,120 B2. (mkr) |
Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Skullcandy, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4351667.) - filed by Earin AB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (mkr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Earin AB v. Skullcandy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Earin AB | |
Represented By: | Brian E. Farnan |
Represented By: | Michael J. Farnan |
Represented By: | Alexandra Fellowes |
Represented By: | Cristofer I. Leffler |
Represented By: | Katherine Bentfield |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Skullcandy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Chad S.C. Stover |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.