Santander Holdings USA, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Company
| Santander Holdings USA, Inc. |
| Federal Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv00293 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc.: For Federal Insurance Company waiver sent on 3/15/2024, answer due 5/14/2024. (Rostocki, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Courtney C.T. Horrigan and Timothy P. Law for Santander Holdings USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) |
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Timothy P. Law, filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc., #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jorge M. Rojas, filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc., and #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Courtney C.T. Horrigan, filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/13/2024. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Timothy P. Law, Jorge M. Rojas, and Courtney C.T. Horrigan. ( re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Timothy P. Law, #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jorge M. Rojas, #5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Courtney C.T. Horrigan )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4355348).(Rostocki, Brian) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Timothy P. Law - filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certification)(Rostocki, Brian) Modified on 3/13/2024 (nms). |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jorge M. Rojas - filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certification)(Rostocki, Brian) Modified on 3/13/2024 (nms). |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Courtney C.T. Horrigan - filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certification)(Rostocki, Brian) Modified on 3/13/2024 (nms). |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Banco Santander, S.A. for Santander Holdings USA, Inc. filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc.. (Rostocki, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Summonses Issued (please complete the top portion of the form and print out for use/service). (mrr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Federal Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4353635.) - filed by Santander Holdings USA, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (mrr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
