Hampel v. Virgin Orbit Holdings, Inc.
| 1:2024cv00328 |
| April 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
ORDER ADOPTING 5 Recommendation that BK Appeal be Withdrawn from Mediation - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the recommendations set forth in the order are ADOPTED and this matter is withdrawn from the mandatory referral for mediation. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that, pursuant to the parties' agreement (D.I. 5 at 2), the following briefing schedule shall govern this appeal: Appellant's Opening Brief - No later than May 20, 2024. Appellee's Answering Brief - Within thirty (30) days after the filing of Appellant's Opening Brief. Appellant's Reply Brief - Within fifteen (15) days after the filing of Appellee's Answering Brief. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/19/2024. (dlw)
|
|
Filing
5
Recommendation that Bankruptcy Appeal be withdrawn from mandatory mediation. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/15/2024. (nmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hampel v. Virgin Orbit Holdings, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
