Frontgate Marketing, Inc. v. AML IP, LLC
| Frontgate Marketing, Inc. |
| AML IP, LLC |
| 1:2024cv00701 |
| June 14, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Frontgate Marketing, Inc..AML IP, LLC served on 7/2/2024, answer due 7/23/2024. (Moskow-Schnoll, Beth) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Clinton R. South for Frontgate Marketing, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd) |
| Filing 7 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Clinton R. South. ( re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Clinton R. South )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4434409).(Moskow-Schnoll, Beth) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Clinton R. South - filed by Frontgate Marketing, Inc.. (Moskow-Schnoll, Beth) |
SO ORDERED re #6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Clinton R. South filed by Frontgate Marketing, Inc. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/20/2024. (dlw)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to AML IP, LLC on 6/18/2024. (jfm) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Qurate Retail, Inc. for Frontgate Marketing, Inc. filed by Frontgate Marketing, Inc.. (Moskow-Schnoll, Beth) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,876,979. (vfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (vfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for DECLARATORY JUDGMENT filed with Jury Demand against AML IP, LLC ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4430600.) - filed by Frontgate Marketing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (vfm) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (vfm) |
| No Summons Issued. (vfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Frontgate Marketing, Inc. v. AML IP, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frontgate Marketing, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Clinton R. South |
| Represented By: | Steven L. Becton, II |
| Represented By: | Beth Moskow-Schnoll |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: AML IP, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
