Wak-Ikram v. Emig et al
Tahlal Wak-Ikram and Robert Potts |
Kathleen Jennings and Brian Emig |
1:2024cv01132 |
October 11, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
Maryellen Noreika |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. Arban on behalf of Brian Emig, Delaware DOJ (530), Kathleen Jennings (Arban, Brian) |
![]() |
Filing 7 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel - filed by Tahlal Wak-Ikram. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Envelope)(mrr) |
Filing 6 AEDPA Election Form filed by petitioner and requesting to rule on 2254 as currently pending. (mrr) |
![]() |
Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM of law in Support D.I. #2 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Tahlal Wak-Ikram. |
Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam) |
Filing 2 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus - filed by Tahlal Wak-Ikram. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Tahlal Wak-Ikram. (oam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.