DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. CommVault Systems, Inc.
| DataCloud Technologies, LLC |
| CommVault Systems, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv01265 |
| November 18, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant CommVault Systems, Inc. to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to January 31, 2025 filed by CommVault Systems, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/8/2025. (lnb)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant CommVault Systems, Inc. to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to January 31, 2025 - filed by CommVault Systems, Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant CommVault Systems, Inc. to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to January 11, 2025 filed by CommVault Systems, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/11/2024. (lnb)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant CommVault Systems, Inc. to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to January 11, 2025 - filed by CommVault Systems, Inc.. (Ying, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC.CommVault Systems, Inc. served on 11/20/2024, answer due 12/11/2024. (Stamoulis, Stamatios) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CommVault Systems, Inc. on 11/18/2024. (cdd) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DataCloud Technologies, LLC filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (cdd) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,560,613 B1; US 7,209,959 B1; US 7,398,298 B2; US 8,156,499 B2. (cdd) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against CommVault Systems, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4551572) - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. CommVault Systems, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CommVault Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Ying |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DataCloud Technologies, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Richard Charles Weinblatt |
| Represented By: | Stamatios Stamoulis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
