Moore v. Bartelt
Plaintiff: Brenden W. Moore
Defendant: Paul Bartelt, II
Case Number: 1:2024cv01290
Filed: November 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2024 Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr)
November 25, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Paul Bartelt, II - filed by Brenden W. Moore. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr)
November 25, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Brenden W. Moore. (mrr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Bartelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenden W. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul Bartelt, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?