Data Resonance LLC v. Resilio Inc.
| Data Resonance LLC |
| Resilio Inc. |
| Resilio Inc. |
| Data Resonance LLC |
| 1:2024cv01335 |
| December 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days, the parties shall jointly prepare and file the following: (i) a proposed Scheduling Order consistent with Judge Hall's "Rule 16 Scheduling Order - Patent", and (ii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, setting forth (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties' positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order; and (c) a list of any other issues the parties want to address at the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. Thereafter, the Court may schedule a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Hall. The Scheduling Order can be found on Judge Hall's portion of the District Court's website. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/4/2025. (ceg)
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Reuben H. Chen, Alexandra Leeper, and Angela Madrigal filed by Resilio Inc. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/4/2025. (ceg)
|
| Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Reuben H. Chen, Alexandra Leeper, and Angela Madrigal. ( re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Reuben H. Chen, Alexandra Leeper, and Angela Madrigal )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4606467).(Jacobs, Karen) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Reuben H. Chen, Alexandra Leeper, and Angela Madrigal - filed by Resilio Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) |
| Filing 9 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Resilio Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM - Defendant Resilio, Inc.'s Answer to Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims against Data Resonance LLC by Resilio Inc..(Jacobs, Karen) |
Filing 7
SO ORDERED, re #6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Data Resonance LLC. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Resilio Inc. answer due 2/3/2025. Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 12/27/2024. (twk) (Main Document 7 replaced on 1/3/2025) (twk).
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer - filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) (Main Document 6 replaced on 1/3/2025) (twk). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-01332-JLH, 1:24-cv-01334-JLH, 1:24-cv-01335-JLH (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Resilio Inc. on 12/10/2024. (nms) |
| Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 6,934,714. (nms) Modified on 12/10/2024 (nms). |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed, filed by Data Resonance LLC. (nms) Modified on 12/10/2024 (nms). |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (nms) Modified on 12/10/2024 (nms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Resilio Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4564536) - filed by Data Resonance LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(nms) Modified on 12/10/2024 (nms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.