Walker v. City of Milford Delaware et al
| Russell E. Walker, Russell E. Scott, Scott Walker and Russell E. (Scott) Walker |
| City of Milford Delaware, Bayhealth Corporation, Brandywine Community Counseling Services, State of Delaware Attorney General's Office and Colm Connolly |
| 1:2025cv00097 |
| January 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER, granting #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/31/2025. (jfm)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT. Acknowledgment filed by Russell E. Walker. (mrr) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Bayhealth Corporation, Brandywine Community Counseling Services, City of Milford Delaware, Colm Connolly, State of Delaware Attorney General's Office - filed by Russell E. Walker. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Russell E. Walker. (mrr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
