Cosner v. United States Army et al
| Katlyn May Cosner |
| United States Army and Dover Air Force Base |
| 1:2025cv00241 |
| March 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: The application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs under 28 U.S.C. 1915 (D.I. #1 ) is granted. The Complaint (D.I. #2 ) is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The Clerk of Court is directed to close this action. (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/5/2025. ***Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff 3/5/2025*** (twk)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Magistrate Consent Forms. Acknowledgment filed by Katlyn May Cosner. (cdd) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against United States Army, Dover Air Force Base (IFP Pending) - filed by Katlyn May Cosner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd). |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Katlyn May Cosner. (cdd) |
| Remark: Pro Se Privacy Notice provided to Plaintiff. (cdd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.