AttestWave LLC v. Bitdefender LLC
| AttestWave LLC |
| Bitdefender LLC |
| 1:2025cv00249 |
| March 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,895,643. (Attachments: #1 Order)(nms) |
Filing 11
SO ORDERED Granting #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/17/2025. (nms)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal, by AttestWave LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) Modified on 7/15/2025 (nms). |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AttestWave LLC.Bitdefender LLC served on 7/10/2025, answer due 7/31/2025. (Garibian, Antranig) |
|
SO ORDERED Granting #8 Request for Extension of Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Bitdefender LLC answer due 7/16/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/17/2025. (nms)
|
| Filing 8 STATUS Report and Request for Extension of Time, by AttestWave LLC. (Garibian, Antranig) Modified on 6/16/2025 (nms). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by AttestWave LLC.Bitdefender LLC served on 3/10/2025, answer due 3/31/2025. (Garibian, Antranig) |
|
Filing 6
ORAL ORDER: More than 90 days have elapsed since the Complaint was filed, and the summons has not been returned for Defendant Bitdefender, LLC. Plaintiff is now directed to file a status letter within three (3) days of this Order. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/9/2025. (nms)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00249-RGA, 1:25-cv-00250-RGA, 1:25-cv-00251-RGA (rjb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bitdefender LLC on 3/5/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by AttestWave LLC. (cdd) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,895,643. (cdd) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Bitdefender LLC (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4628348) - filed by AttestWave LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AttestWave LLC v. Bitdefender LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AttestWave LLC | |
| Represented By: | Antranig N. Garibian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bitdefender LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
