Anderson v. PennyMac Loan Services
Plaintiff: Tamika Shintel Anderson
Defendant: PennyMac Loan Services
Case Number: 1:2025cv00268
Filed: March 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Maryellen Noreika
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2025 Filing 17 Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Counsel to Defendant PennyMac Loan Services, LLC regarding No Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6), #14 Letter, #15 Order, #13 Certificate of Service,. (Thomas, Lawrence)
July 8, 2025 Filing 16 Letter to Clerk of Court, from Tamika Shintel Anderson, regarding Request for Surety Bond and ISIN Disclosure for Federal Judge Maryellen Noreika. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cdd)
June 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before July 18, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a response to the pending motion to dismiss. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of the Complaint. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/26/2025. ***Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff 6/26/2025*** (dlw)
June 24, 2025 Filing 14 Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Counsel to Defendant PennyMac Loan Services, LLC regarding No Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss - re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6), #13 Certificate of Service,. (Thomas, Lawrence)
May 29, 2025 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of (i) Entry of Appearance [D.I. 10]; (ii) Defendant PennyMac Loan Services, LLCs Motion to Dismiss [D.I. 11]; and (iii) PennyMac Loan Services, LLCs Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 [D.I. 12] by PennyMac Loan Services re #11 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6), #12 Disclosure Statement, #10 Notice of Appearance (Thomas, Lawrence)
May 28, 2025 Filing 12 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Private National Mortgage Acceptance Company, LLC, Corporate Parent PennyMac Financial Services, Inc., Corporate Parent PNMAC Holdings, Inc. for PennyMac Loan Services filed by PennyMac Loan Services. (Thomas, Lawrence)
May 28, 2025 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(5) and 12(b)(6) - filed by PennyMac Loan Services. (Attachments: #1 Attorney Declaration, #2 PennyMac Declaration, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certificate of Service)(Thomas, Lawrence)
May 28, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Raymond Thomas, III on behalf of PennyMac Loan Services (Thomas, Lawrence)
May 8, 2025 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tamika Shintel Anderson. PennyMac Loan Services served on 5/7/2025, answer due 5/28/2025. (dlw)
May 6, 2025 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to PennyMac Loan Services on 5/6/2025. (mpb)
May 2, 2025 Filing 7 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT FOR F.R. Civ. P. 4. Acknowledgment filed by Tamika Shintel Anderson. (mrr)
May 2, 2025 Filing fee paid by Tamika Shintel Anderson: $ 405.00, receipt number 4014 (mrr)
April 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING request to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall pay the $405.00 filing fee within 30-days or the case shall be dismissed. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/3/2025. ***Copy first class mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff 4/3/2025*** (dlw)
March 26, 2025 Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Tamika Shintel Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(slk)
March 26, 2025 CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I 5 removed, filed in error. (slk)
March 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall either: (1) submit a completed long form (AO Form 239) application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs (in forma pauperis) (copy attached), or (2) pay in full the $405.00 filing fee. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/18/2025. ***Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff 3/18/2025*** (dlw)
March 12, 2025 Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
March 6, 2025 Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd)
March 6, 2025 Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se against PennyMac Loan Services (IFP PENDING) - filed by Tamika Shintel Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement of Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd).
March 6, 2025 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Tamika Shintel Anderson. (cdd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. PennyMac Loan Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamika Shintel Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PennyMac Loan Services
Represented By: Lawrence Raymond Thomas, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?