Stryker Corporation v. Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC
| Stryker Corporation |
| Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC |
| 1:2025cv00282 |
| March 10, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Manuel A. Franco & Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. for Stryker Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
SO ORDERED, re #17 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Patrick J. Arnold Jr. and Manuel A. Franco filed by Stryker Corporation. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 8/1/2025. (ceg)
|
| Filing 18 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Patrick J. Arnold Jr. and Manuel A. Franco. ( re #17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Patrick J. Arnold Jr. and Manuel A. Franco )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4748879).(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Patrick J. Arnold Jr. and Manuel A. Franco - filed by Stryker Corporation. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of Manuel A. Franco re #15 Opening Brief in Support, by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Certificate of Service)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #14 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC MOTION for Permanent Injunction MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Stryker Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/12/2025. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC, MOTION for Permanent Injunction , MOTION for Attorney Fees - filed by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 13 DECLARATION of Michael J. Farnan re #11 Clerk's Entry of Default by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 12 Letter to The Clerk of Court from Atheer Faleh on behalf of Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC regarding the Name Change of the Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope)(oam) Modified on 6/30/2025 (ceg). |
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC re: #9 Request for Default filed by Stryker Corporation. (ceg) |
| Filing 10 DECLARATION of Patrick J. Arnold Jr. re #9 REQUEST for Default as to Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 9 REQUEST for Default as to Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC - filed by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 8 STATUS REPORT by Stryker Corporation. (Farnan, Michael) |
|
Filing 7
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a status report on or before May 22, 2025. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 5/15/2025. (ceg)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Stryker Corporation.Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC served on 3/11/2025, answer due 4/1/2025. (Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC on 3/10/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Stryker Corporation. (cdd) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 730,498; 1,016,798; 4,309,596. (cdd) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement and Cybersquatting with Jury Demand against Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4632485) - filed by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stryker Corporation v. Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stryker Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Farnan |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Farnan |
| Represented By: | Patrick J. Arnold, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Manuel A. Franco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Styker Endoscope Camera System Development and Design LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
