Telsync Technologies LLC v. GE Vernova Inc.
Plaintiff: Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant: GE Vernova Inc.
Counter-Claimant: GE Vernova Inc.
Counter-Defendant: Telsync Technologies LLC
Case Number: 1:2025cv00473
Filed: April 17, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Gregory B Williams
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2025 Filing 13 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks.(lnb)
July 29, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re #11 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Telsync Technologies LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 7/29/2025. (lnb)
July 28, 2025 Filing 11 STIPULATION of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE by Telsync Technologies LLC. (Garibian, Antranig)
July 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, by no later than September 22, 2025, the parties shall meet and confer and file with the Court a joint proposed Scheduling Order in this action consistent with the applicable form Scheduling Order of Judge Williams, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (See Chambers, Judge Williams, Forms), along with a cover letter requesting the Court to enter the joint proposed Scheduling Order, if there are no disputes or other issues concerning scheduling that the Court needs to resolve. If there are disputes or other issues in the joint proposed Scheduling Order the Court needs to resolve, in the cover letter, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in the joint proposed Scheduling Order in which those disputes appear and a Rule 16(b) scheduling conference will be held via teleconference on September 29, 2025, at 3:00 p.m. In the event the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference is necessary, counsel for Plaintiff(s) shall coordinate the teleconference and, by no later than September 26, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., provide the dial-in information for the teleconference in writing to the Court and counsel for Defendant(s). ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 7/25/2025. (lnb)
July 25, 2025 Set Hearings: A Telephone Conference is set for 9/29/2025 at 03:00 PM Telephonically before Judge Gregory B. Williams. (lnb)
June 13, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicof filed by Telsync Technologies LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/13/2025. (lnb)
June 12, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicof - filed by Telsync Technologies LLC. (Garibian, Antranig)
June 12, 2025 Filing 8 First ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS COUNTERCLAIMS by Telsync Technologies LLC.(Garibian, Antranig)
May 22, 2025 Filing 7 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by GE Vernova Inc.. (Sundermeir, Grayson)
May 22, 2025 Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand and Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against Telsync Technologies LLC by GE Vernova Inc..(Sundermeir, Grayson)
April 23, 2025 Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb)
April 17, 2025 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to GE Vernova Inc. on 4/17/2025. (scs)
April 17, 2025 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Telsync Technologies LLC. (scs)
April 17, 2025 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,897,263. (scs)
April 17, 2025 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (scs)
April 17, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against GE Vernova Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4664791) - filed by Telsync Technologies LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(scs) (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/22/2025) (nms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Telsync Technologies LLC v. GE Vernova Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Telsync Technologies LLC
Represented By: Antranig N. Garibian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GE Vernova Inc.
Represented By: Grayson P. Sundermeir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-claimant: GE Vernova Inc.
Represented By: Grayson P. Sundermeir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter-defendant: Telsync Technologies LLC
Represented By: Antranig N. Garibian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?