Harris Randolph v. Elliot et al
| Philip C. Harris Randolph |
| Tyler Elliot and John Pussey |
| 1:2025cv00533 |
| May 1, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by John Pussey, Tyler Elliot: For John Pussey waiver filed on 10/22/2025, answer due 12/22/2025; Tyler Elliot waiver filed on 10/22/2025, answer due 12/22/2025. (Picollelli, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas D Picollelli, Jr on behalf of Tyler Elliot, John Pussey (Picollelli, Nicholas) |
Filing 8
DDOC-DDOJ 90 days Service Order: Plaintiff's motion requesting appointment of counsel (D.I. #7 ) is DENIED without prejudice to renewal at a later state of this case. Defendant Lieutenant Matthew Long is TERMINATED as a party to this action. Defendant Warden Scott Ceresini is TERMINATED as a party to this action. The Clerk of Court shall notify the Delaware Department of Correction ("DDOC") and the Delaware Department of Justice ("DDOJ") of this Service Order. The Clerk of Court shall serve an electronic copy of the Complaint (D.I. #1 ) on the DDOC and the DDOJ. DDOC Defendants shall have ninety (90) days from entry of this Service Order to file a Waiver of Service Executed and/or a Waiver of Service Unexecuted. Upon the electronic filing of the Waiver of Service Executed, DDOC Defendants shall have sixty (60) days to answer or otherwise respond to the pro se complaint (see order for further details). Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 07/22/2025. (Attachments: #1 D.I. 1 - Complaint) (jfm)
|
| Filing 7 LETTER/MOTION Requesting Appointment of Counsel - filed by Philip C. Harris Randolph. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope)(cdd) |
| Filing 6 Authorization by Philip C. Harris Randolph requesting Prison Business Office to disburse payments to the Clerk of the Court. (copy of assessment order and authorization sent to Prison Business Office) (oam) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/6/2025: #1 Envelope) (oam). |
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting Motion to Proceed IFP. Filing Fee of $350 Assessed. An initial partial filing fee of $52.74 shall be required. Plaintiff shall return the attached payment authorization within 30 days. Failure to return payment authorization shall result in dismissal of action without prejudice. (Notice of Compliance deadline set for 6/9/2025). Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 05/09/2025. (Attachments: #1 Authorization) (jfm)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 4 Trust Fund Account Statement - filed by Philip C. Harris Randolph (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jfm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Philip C. Harris Randolph. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (scs) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 with Jury Demand against Tyler Elliot, Matthew Long, John Pussey, Scott Ceresini (No Civil Cover Sheet, no IFP) - filed by Philip C. Harris Randolph. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
